Skip to main content
Search

Capital Gains Tax and MPS

Date: 24 July 2024

11 minute read

What is Capital Gains Tax (CGT)?

Capital gains tax is the tax incurred on gains made upon the sale of an asset.

If your investments perform well and are sold for a profit, then any capital gains made which are held outside of a tax wrapper, such as an ISA, SIPP or offshore bond, and which are above your tax-free allowance (also known as the annual exempt amount (AEA)) may be subject to CGT.

What are CGT rates?

Current CGT for basic rate taxpayers is 10%, or 18% if the asset is a residential property, whilst for higher or additional rate taxpayers it is 20% on shares/funds and 24% on residential property. For context, income tax is 40% for higher rate payers and 45% for additional rate payers.

How much is the annual exempt amount (AEA) this year?

The AEA for capital gains tax has been halved, completing a two-staged reduction that significantly diminishes its benefits. For the 2024/25 tax year the AEA for capital gains tax (CGT) has been set at £3,000, down from £6,000 in 2023/24 and £12,300 in 2022/23. For many investors this means that a larger portion of their returns from investments will be subject to this levy.

What is a Managed Portfolio Service (MPS)?

An MPS is a centrally run set of strategies of differing risk profiles, where the investment managers have discretion over the holdings in each strategy, and all clients in each strategy hold the same investments. Most MPS’ are constructed to provide clients with exposure to a range of asset classes.

What does the change in the AEA mean for Managed Portfolio Services (MPS)?

Traditionally these asset classes are accessed through the selection of externally managed third-party funds. To implement any changes at the security level, i.e., to sell one fund in order to buy another (for instance, to reflect a change in the investment manager’s preferred exposures) requires an investment manager to adjust the blend of these external funds.

As an example, should an investment manager wish to increase the exposure to technology companies within a client’s North American equity exposure, they may be required to reduce (or sell in full) the holding of a fund with zero exposure to this sector, in favour of another that has been positioned to hold a number of these companies. If a client’s MPS portfolio was held within a general investment account (GIA), and their AEA had been exceeded for the year, this action would represent a chargeable event.

What about Quilter Cheviot’s MPS?

Our approach to constructing MPS portfolios is unique and is centred around the incorporation of the ‘Building Blocks’, a range of eight funds designed exclusively for use within Quilter Cheviot’s MPS strategies. These funds are combined in different weights to create our MPS strategies, which provide a range of different investment objectives and risk profiles for clients:

Graphs showing how our Building Blocks form our MPS strategies

Constructing our MPS strategies in this manner brings with it a number of benefits, including complete control over how your investment portfolio is composed.

By having responsibility as the MPS model manager (determining the blend of asset classes within the strategy by setting the chosen weight to each Building Block), as well as acting as the appointed fund manager to each Building Block (determining the underlying investments within each Building Block fund), our approach reduces the possibility of crystallisation events occurring at the security level. This is because changes to security selection exposures take place within the underlying Building Block funds, an environment not subject to CGT. Only asset allocation changes which are made on an ad hoc basis (e.g., reducing the European Building Block in favour of the UK Building Block) are deemed crystallisation events, thereby potentially realising a profit or loss for CGT purposes.

To revisit our example from earlier, a decision to increase exposure to technology companies within the North American equity exposure would be implemented within Quilter Cheviot’s MPS in a swift, granular fashion: one that avoids the need for time out of the market or, crucially for this example, a requirement to crystallise profits at the portfolio level. The MPS managers would simply implement this investment decision within the North American Building Block fund, increasing exposure to the preferred companies within the sector. An example of the types of securities directly owned within the fund can be found below:

Table showing the top holding in the North American Equity Fund

As can be seen, this Building Blocks approach allows us to be more agile than traditional MPS solutions.

What does this mean for clients?

Whilst our MPS is CGT agnostic (we do not consider tax implications in our investment decisions), since moving to the “Building Blocks” approach our portfolio turnover (how often securities are bought and sold - a key consideration for CGT purposes) has been significantly reduced, with most of our investment management decisions occurring within one of these Building Blocks. For a typical MPS Balanced client, portfolio turnover* was 6% during 2023 and 14% during 2022, both down from an average of 26% during 2018-2020.

The continued reduction in portfolio turnover also occurred when the investment management team were particularly active in implementing changes to the underlying holdings within the strategy: a function of the exceptionally fastchanging market backdrop.

For a typical MPS Balanced client, portfolio turnover* was 6% during 2023 and 14% during 2022, both down from an average of 26% during 2018-2020.
*Based on analysis of MPS client accounts in Quilter Cheviot’s custody

Is there a right answer?

The reduction in the AEA may encourage some investors to avoid realising gains, postponing crystallisation events in an attempt to minimise their tax bill. While this may appear preferable in the near term, over the longer term this strategy may be detrimental.

If, for instance, future CGT rates are higher, perhaps even equalised with those on income tax, then it may be deemed preferable to avoid storing up all returns.

For CGT purposes, our offering sits somewhere in between a traditional MPS and a multi-asset fund, whereby no returns are realised and there is a full gross roll-up in profits. As discussed, the approach also delivers a number of key implementation benefits, while also ensuring exceptional value-for-money for what constitutes a fully active investment solution.

Please contact your usual Quilter Cheviot representative should you wish to learn more, or alternatively visit Managed Portfolio Service | Quilter Cheviot for additional information.

This material is not tax, legal or accounting advice and should not be relied on for tax, legal or accounting purposes. Quilter Cheviot Limited does not provide tax, legal or accounting advice. You should consult your own tax, legal and accounting adviser(s) before engaging in any transaction.

Author

Antony Webb

Head of MPS Investment Funds

Contact your local IM or get in touch

To find out more please contact your Investment Manager get in touch.

Get in touch

Subscribe to the MPS newsletter

Get the inside view from Quilter Cheviot delivered straight to your inbox.

Subscribe

The value of your investments and the income from them can fall and you may not recover what you invested.